A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | CH | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9
National Football League articles by quality and importance | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Quality | Importance | ||||||
Top | High | Mid | Low | NA | ??? | Total | |
FA | 3 | 8 | 6 | 17 | |||
FL | 2 | 3 | 89 | 21 | 115 | ||
FM | 2 | 2 | |||||
GA | 45 | 16 | 105 | 214 | 1 | 381 | |
B | 112 | 168 | 276 | 221 | 3 | 780 | |
C | 184 | 173 | 813 | 1,556 | 19 | 2,745 | |
Start | 196 | 543 | 2,524 | 8,884 | 2,754 | 14,901 | |
Stub | 42 | 1,171 | 5,972 | 1 | 9,521 | 16,707 | |
List | 6 | 35 | 211 | 620 | 4 | 1 | 877 |
Category | 1,809 | 1,809 | |||||
Disambig | 33 | 33 | |||||
File | 948 | 948 | |||||
Portal | 1 | 1 | |||||
Project | 1 | 1 | 52 | 54 | |||
Redirect | 2 | 2 | 16 | 7,518 | 7,538 | ||
Template | 4,153 | 4,153 | |||||
NA | 1 | 10 | 3 | 14 | |||
Other | 4 | 61 | 65 | ||||
Assessed | 548 | 983 | 5,200 | 17,525 | 14,585 | 12,299 | 51,140 |
Unassessed | 1 | 10 | 11 | ||||
Total | 548 | 983 | 5,200 | 17,526 | 14,585 | 12,309 | 51,151 |
WikiWork factors (?) | ω = 188,825 | Ω = 5.31 |
This is the assessment department for the National Football League WikiProject. This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia articles relating to the National Football League. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.
The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject National Football League}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:National Football League articles by quality and Category:National Football League articles by importance.
Frequently asked questions
- How can I get my article rated?
- As a member of the NFL WikiProject, you can do it yourself. If you're unsure, list it in the requesting an assessment section below.
- Who can assess articles?
- Any member of the project is free to add—or change—the rating of an article, but please follow the guidelines.
- Why did someone change the assessment of a particular article?
- You should start by asking the person who assessed the article; if you leave a note on their Talk page they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning. If you'd like a second opinion, then list the article in the requesting an assessment section below and someone will take a look.
- Where can I get more comments about my article?
- You may consider listing the article for a Peer review.
- What if I don't agree with a rating?
- Relist it as a request or post a note on the project talk page.
- Aren't the ratings subjective?
- Yes, they are (see, in particular, the disclaimers on the importance scale), but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!
If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.
Instructions
Quality assessment
An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WikiProject National Football League}} project banner on its talk page: {{WikiProject National Football League|class=???}}
The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Content assessment for assessment criteria):
FA (for featured articles only; adds articles to Category:FA-Class National Football League articles) | FA | |
A (adds articles to Category:A-Class National Football League articles) | A | |
GA (for good articles only; adds articles to Category:GA-Class National Football League articles) | GA | |
B (adds articles to Category:B-Class National Football League articles) | B | |
C (adds articles to Category:C-Class National Football League articles) | C | |
Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class National Football League articles) | Start | |
Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class National Football League articles) | Stub | |
FL (for featured lists only; adds articles to Category:FL-Class National Football League articles) | FL | |
List (adds articles to Category:List-Class National Football League articles) | List |
For non-standard grades and non-mainspace content, the following values may be used for the class parameter:
- The quality parameter should be assigned according to the Quality scale below.
Importance assessment
An article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{WikiProject National Football League}} project banner on its talk page:
The following values may be used for the importance parameter to describe the relative importance of the article within the project (see Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Priority of topic for assessment criteria):
Top (adds articles to Category:Top-importance National Football League articles) | Top | |
High (adds articles to Category:High-importance National Football League articles) | High | |
Mid (adds articles to Category:Mid-importance National Football League articles) | Mid | |
Low (adds articles to Category:Low-importance National Football League articles) | Low | |
NA (adds articles to Category:NA-importance National Football League articles) | NA | |
??? (articles for which a valid importance rating has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unknown-importance National Football League articles) | ??? |
Quality scale
Class | Criteria | Reader's experience | Editing suggestions | Example |
---|---|---|---|---|
FA | The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates. More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured article criteria:
A featured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes.
|
Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. | Jim Thorpe, Heidi Game (as of January 2012) |
FL | The article has attained featured list status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured list candidates. More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured list criteria:
|
Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. | 2007 NFL Draft, List of New England Patriots head coaches, Super Bowl Most Valuable Player Award (as of January 2012) |
A | The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class. More detailed criteria
The article meets the A-Class criteria:
Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in Wikipedia:Article development. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history). |
Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting. | Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help. | Battle of Nam River (as of June 2014) |
GA | The article meets all of the good article criteria, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations. More detailed criteria
A good article is:
|
Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication. | Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing. | Jack Kemp, Lawrence Taylor, 1986 New York Giants season (as of January 2012) |
B | The article meets all of the B-Class criteria. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards. More detailed criteria
|
Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher. | A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines. | AFL–NFL merger, Bert Bell, Tony Dungy (as of January 2012) |
C | The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup. More detailed criteria
The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or flow.
|
Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. | Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems. | Aeneas Williams, Daunte Culpepper, Edgar Manske, 1999 St. Louis Rams season (as of January 2012) |
Start | An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources. More detailed criteria
The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following:
|
Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more. | Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use. | 1945 Cleveland Rams season, Ernie Stautner, Laveranues Coles (as of January 2012) |
Stub | A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria. | Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant. | Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant. | Cotton Davidson, Sam Davis (American football), Hardy Nickerson (as of January 2012) |
List | Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list or set index article, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. | There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader. | Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized. | "Whizzer" White NFL Man of the Year Award, Chicago Bears statistics, List of New Orleans Saints starting quarterbacks (as of January 2012) |
Category | Any category falls under this class. | Categories are mainly used to group together articles within a particular subject area. | Large categories may need to be split into one or more subcategories. Be wary of articles that have been miscategorized. | Category:2000 National Football League season by team, Category:Defunct National Football League teams |
Disambig | Any disambiguation page falls under this class. | The page serves to distinguish multiple articles that share the same (or similar) title. | Additions should be made as new articles of that name are created. Pay close attention to the proper naming of such pages, as they often do not need "(disambiguation)" appended to the title. | Glossary of football terms |
File | Zdroj:https://en.wikipedia.org?pojem=Wikipedia:WikiProject_National_Football_League/Assessment