In mathematics, and more specifically in ring theory, an ideal of a ring is a special subset of its elements. Ideals generalize certain subsets of the integers, such as the even numbers or the multiples of 3. Addition and subtraction of even numbers preserves evenness, and multiplying an even number by any integer (even or odd) results in an even number; these closure and absorption properties are the defining properties of an ideal. An ideal can be used to construct a quotient ring in a way similar to how, in group theory, a normal subgroup can be used to construct a quotient group.

Among the integers, the ideals correspond one-for-one with the non-negative integers: in this ring, every ideal is a principal ideal consisting of the multiples of a single non-negative number. However, in other rings, the ideals may not correspond directly to the ring elements, and certain properties of integers, when generalized to rings, attach more naturally to the ideals than to the elements of the ring. For instance, the prime ideals of a ring are analogous to prime numbers, and the Chinese remainder theorem can be generalized to ideals. There is a version of unique prime factorization for the ideals of a Dedekind domain (a type of ring important in number theory).

The related, but distinct, concept of an ideal in order theory is derived from the notion of ideal in ring theory. A fractional ideal is a generalization of an ideal, and the usual ideals are sometimes called integral ideals for clarity.

History

Ernst Kummer invented the concept of ideal numbers to serve as the "missing" factors in number rings in which unique factorization fails; here the word "ideal" is in the sense of existing in imagination only, in analogy with "ideal" objects in geometry such as points at infinity.^[1] In 1876, Richard Dedekind replaced Kummer's undefined concept by concrete sets of numbers, sets that he called ideals, in the third edition of Dirichlet's book Vorlesungen über Zahlentheorie, to which Dedekind had added many supplements.^[1][2][3] Later the notion was extended beyond number rings to the setting of polynomial rings and other commutative rings by David Hilbert and especially Emmy Noether.

Definitions and motivation

For an arbitrary ring ${\displaystyle (R,+,\cdot )}$, let ${\displaystyle (R,+)}$ be its additive group. A subset I is called a left ideal of ${\displaystyle R}$ if it is an additive subgroup of ${\displaystyle R}$ that "absorbs multiplication from the left by elements of ${\displaystyle R}$"; that is, ${\displaystyle I}$ is a left ideal if it satisfies the following two conditions:

1. ${\displaystyle (I,+)}$ is a subgroup of ${\displaystyle (R,+)}$,
2. For every ${\displaystyle r\in R}$ and every ${\displaystyle x\in I}$, the product ${\displaystyle rx}$ is in ${\displaystyle I}$.

A right ideal is defined with the condition ${\displaystyle rx\in I}$ replaced by ${\displaystyle xr\in I}$. A two-sided ideal is a left ideal that is also a right ideal, and is sometimes simply called an ideal. In the language of modules, the definitions mean that a left (resp. right, two-sided) ideal of ${\displaystyle R}$ is an ${\displaystyle R}$-submodule of ${\displaystyle R}$ when ${\displaystyle R}$ is viewed as a left (resp. right, bi-) ${\displaystyle R}$-module. When ${\displaystyle R}$ is a commutative ring, the definitions of left, right, and two-sided ideal coincide, and the term ideal is used alone.

To understand the concept of an ideal, consider how ideals arise in the construction of rings of "elements modulo". For concreteness, let us look at the ring ${\displaystyle \mathbb {Z} /n\mathbb {Z} }$ of integers modulo ${\displaystyle n}$ given an integer ${\displaystyle n\in \mathbb {Z} }$ (${\displaystyle \mathbb {Z} }$ is a commutative ring). The key observation here is that we obtain ${\displaystyle \mathbb {Z} /n\mathbb {Z} }$ by taking the integer line ${\displaystyle \mathbb {Z} }$ and wrapping it around itself so that various integers get identified. In doing so, we must satisfy two requirements:

1. ${\displaystyle n}$ must be identified with 0 since ${\displaystyle n}$ is congruent to 0 modulo ${\displaystyle n}$.
2. the resulting structure must again be a ring.

The second requirement forces us to make additional identifications (i.e., it determines the precise way in which we must wrap ${\displaystyle \mathbb {Z} }$ around itself). The notion of an ideal arises when we ask the question:

What is the exact set of integers that we are forced to identify with 0?

The answer is, unsurprisingly, the set ${\displaystyle n\mathbb {Z} =\{nm\mid m\in \mathbb {Z} \}}$ of all integers congruent to 0 modulo ${\displaystyle n}$. That is, we must wrap ${\displaystyle \mathbb {Z} }$ around itself infinitely many times so that the integers ${\displaystyle \ldots ,-2n,-n,n,2n,3n,\ldots }$ will all align with 0. If we look at what properties this set must satisfy in order to ensure that ${\displaystyle \mathbb{Z}/n\mathbb{Z}}$Zdroj:https://en.wikipedia.org?pojem=Ring_ideal
Text je dostupný za podmienok Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License 3.0 Unported; prípadne za ďalších podmienok. Podrobnejšie informácie nájdete na stránke Podmienky použitia.