A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | CH | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9
moooooo Dirtyfilthy (talk) 21:43, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
WP:AFD/Spots (cannabis)
On this AFD discussion page, you have wrongfully accused me of acting out of bad faith. I am somewhat offended, but I am attempting not to take it personally. I apologize if it seems I have a vendetta against the article, or cannabis users in general. Honestly, I simply don't find the subject notable enough for its own article. I think it would be a very good entry in a larger article about cannabis consumption, though. I think the same about the joints and bongs articles. ~ Wakanda's Black Panther!♠/♦ 00:33, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
I would like to reiterate the same. Also, allow me to blatantly violate WP:CIVIL for a moment, because I am fucking sick of this shit. There are certain very stoned people on Wikipedia who falsely assume that just because I oppose certain unsourced crud on Wikipedia, that I am some straight-laced person who has never touched a joint. Listen, I've been to college, and let me tell you, I tried just about everything that didn't involve a needle. It is fucked up that people assume otherwise. I think some of this material needs a mention on Wikipedia, but the problem with a whole article on some of these topics is that it is very hard to find reliable sources, so the page just ends up being a bunch of people blogging about the crazy shit they thought up to smoke stuff. It's all word-of-mouth and not very encyclopedic.There seems to be a perception that either you are in favor of filling Wikipedia with D00D LETZ GET STONED! articles, or else you are a DEA agent. That is crap, and I'm really sick of it. --Jaysweet (talk) 02:57, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
Sock/Meat
I won't hold it against you, since you had the good faith to apologize. However, I would like to ask you a question or two, and ask that you answer honestly. Are you this user? Or are you a friend or acquaintance of that user? The reason I ask is that this account's only contributions are in Spots (cannabis) and its related AFD discussion. ~ Wakanda's Black Panther!♠/♦ 15:46, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
Well, that's what's known as meatpuppeting. Are there any other users or IPs that you know are real-world friends with that person? (I hope you don't mind that I moved this to a new header, BTW.) ~ Wakanda's Black Panther!♠/♦ 00:03, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
You've already admitted to being a meatpuppet("...but I am friends in RL with that user, that's how the article being up for deletion came to my attention in the first place."), though I don't think you're acting out of bad faith. In fact, on behalf of Wikipedia, I welcome you here, and hope that you decide to stay. Still, you didn't answer my question. Do you know if anyone else is a friend of that IP?
Anyway, the lack of citations and How-to-ish feel of Spots (cannabis) has been fixed, in my opinion. The big problem now is world-wide notability(to establish it as worthy of a standing article) and, to a lesser extent, the lack of real content. As I've said, I think it would be better in a larger article about consuming cannabis. But, agree to disagree. ~ Wakanda's Black Panther!♠/♦ 00:41, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
What do you mean?
What do you mean by this:
<!-- linked to from Spots (Cannabis)-->
Do you mean that the "Adverse effects" section has a link in the Spots (cannabis) article? Or that the Spots section of Cannabis smoking article is linked to from Spots (cannabis)? Or something else? Please explain. ~ Wakanda's Black Panther!♠/♦ 00:06, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry for ambiguity, I mean I link to Adverse effects from Spots (cannabis) Dirtyfilthy (talk) 00:13, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
- No worries, it just took a moment to register the change to Spots (cannabis) in my watchlist. I don't think a {{main}} is the way to go, though. Maybe a {{seealso|Cannabis smoking#Adverse effects}}, whoich would produce:
~ Wakanda's Black Panther!♠/♦ 00:24, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
- Sweet, thanks, will change Dirtyfilthy (talk) 00:26, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
- Actually, (Lol, a little tired from work.) I think {{further| Cannabis smoking#Adverse effects|Adverse effects of smoking cannabis}} would be better. I'm gonna go ahead and change it, if you don't mind. ~ Wakanda's Black Panther!♠/♦ 00:31, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
- Sure, that's what wikipedia's about right? Dirtyfilthy (talk) 00:40, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
- Actually, (Lol, a little tired from work.) I think {{further| Cannabis smoking#Adverse effects|Adverse effects of smoking cannabis}} would be better. I'm gonna go ahead and change it, if you don't mind. ~ Wakanda's Black Panther!♠/♦ 00:31, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
Text je dostupný za podmienok Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License 3.0 Unported; prípadne za ďalších podmienok. Podrobnejšie informácie nájdete na stránke Podmienky použitia.
Antropológia
Aplikované vedy
Bibliometria
Dejiny vedy
Encyklopédie
Filozofia vedy
Forenzné vedy
Humanitné vedy
Knižničná veda
Kryogenika
Kryptológia
Kulturológia
Literárna veda
Medzidisciplinárne oblasti
Metódy kvantitatívnej analýzy
Metavedy
Metodika
Text je dostupný za podmienok Creative
Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License 3.0 Unported; prípadne za ďalších
podmienok.
Podrobnejšie informácie nájdete na stránke Podmienky
použitia.
www.astronomia.sk | www.biologia.sk | www.botanika.sk | www.dejiny.sk | www.economy.sk | www.elektrotechnika.sk | www.estetika.sk | www.farmakologia.sk | www.filozofia.sk | Fyzika | www.futurologia.sk | www.genetika.sk | www.chemia.sk | www.lingvistika.sk | www.politologia.sk | www.psychologia.sk | www.sexuologia.sk | www.sociologia.sk | www.veda.sk I www.zoologia.sk