The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:02, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

File:Mural honoring Dick Scott (Clipper Magazine Stadium - Lancaster, Pennsylvania).png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Paleorthodox (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

see c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mural honoring Dick Scott (Clipper Magazine Stadium - Lancaster, Pennsylvania).png Magog the Ogre (t • c) 02:55, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

• Delete Derivative work, no valid NFCC justification. I don't see that it adds to the article. You can see better images on their website (and they own said copyright). Buffs (talk) 05:22, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F3 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:04, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

File:EL Bob bartlett.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mycranthebigman (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

sloppily uploaded without proper license; likely non-free Magog the Ogre (t • c) 03:05, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

When I first found the image, you were allowed, and the website even had a button, for you to freely download the image, without any watermarks. The source was https://archives.hunaheritage.org/digital-heritage/legislator-frank-see-sr-senator-bob-bartlett and it states that the license is CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0 Mycranthebigalt (talk) 08:42, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

• Speedy delete per WP:F3 as an invalid license. CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0 is not the same license as CC-BY-SA-4.0, and the NC (non-commercial), and ND (no derivatives) means that this image has a license that is not sufficiently free for Wikipedia. -- Whpq (talk) 15:03, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Unclear copyright status. Looked into this a bit myself, and it's not clear whether this is a work by the Alaskan government (in which case this is likely non-free) or the US federal government (in which case it would be PD). Also noting for the record that there is a PD image of Waino Hendrickson, so this image is not eligible for fair use. No prejudice to restoration if a) someone can produce a reliable source proving that this is indeed the work of the Alaskan government and that Alaskan government works are PD, or b) that this is indeed a photograph by the US federal government. -FASTILY 01:05, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

File:Waino hendrickson portrait.PNG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mycranthebigman (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

sloppily uploaded without proper license; likely non-free Magog the Ogre (t • c) 03:06, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

it says fair use on the website Mycranthebigalt (talk) 08:44, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

website is in the source, the vilda one Mycranthebigalt (talk) 08:47, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

• Delete as a copyright violation. The uploader tagged the image as CC-BY-SA-4.0 licensing but is now arguing it is fair use. The linked copypright information page makes it clear this is not under any sort of Creative Commons license. A simple claim of fair use is not acceptable as Wikipedia policy for non-free content is stricter than fair use. This image cannot be converted to use as non-free content as the article already contains a free image of the subject and so WP:NFCC#1 cannot be met. -- Whpq (talk) 15:09, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
• Keep "Released for fair use" demonstrates a woeful misunderstanding of copyright law. Everything can be used under "fair use" if the usage meets fair use criteria...no permission is needed. All that said, the original photo no longer has a copyright as it is not registered anywhere I can find with the US Government. Given the date of publication (appears to be his official photo as Governor) is a registration of the copyright with the US government was required and I can find no such registration. Accordingly, it should be kept and labeled as such. Buffs (talk) 05:15, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

  Thank you. Mycranthebigman (talk) 18:44, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

  And yet still no one has fixed this file with the required fair use rationale and template. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 00:23, 15 May 2022 (UTC)reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 18 May 2022 (UTC)reply

File:Bartlett and gruening 1964.jpeg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mycranthebigman (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

sloppily uploaded without proper license; likely non-free Magog the Ogre (t • c) 03:06, 10 May 2022 (UTC)reply

IIRC, I got this from the Anchorage Daily News Photo Archive. Looking it up, I can't find anything, but I remember hearing that their images are public domain Mycranthebigalt (talk) 08:45, 10 May 2022 (UTC)reply

• Delete unless proper sourcing and licensing can be verified. IIRC? You need to provide a link to the source instead of stating that it might be in some archive if you remember correctly. And remembering hearing that it is public domain is not sufficient proof that the photo is public domain, although I note that you uploaded it as CC-BY-SA-4.0 -- Whpq (talk) 15:13, 10 May 2022 (UTC)reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 18 May 2022 (UTC)reply

File:Light Blade weapon system.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by SamMontana (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Photo from 1 of the Light Blade. Why is it impossible to create a freely licensed alternative? It may not be easy, but for example 2 has a photo that was taken by RFI/Michel Paul. The text says "Michel Paul accepted the invitation of the Israeli border police near Gaza to see how the laser cannon works." so this thing isn't completely locked up tight from civilians. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 06:40, 10 May 2022 (UTC)reply

• Delete - the replaceability rationale of "because there are no others" does not really address why an image cannot be created. This is an existing deployed weapon system so a free image seems like it could be created. -- Whpq (talk) 15:16, 10 May 2022 (UTC)reply
• Delete Another could be taken unless it can be demonstrated that such a device cannot be photographed because it is classified...and only released photos can be be used. I don't see that contention being made. Buffs (talk) 16:04, 11 May 2022 (UTC)reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. ✗plicit 23:41, 17 May 2022 (UTC)reply

File:BTS Proof album cover art.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Carlobunnie (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

The cover is a simple geometric stylized "PROOF". It is trapezoids forming "PROOF". 2001:448A:708C:1EB2:39A2:4DF6:14D:8B89 (talk) 14:14, 10 May 2022 (UTC)reply

• Speedy keep this is a non-free cover art. Though existing of shapes, it is highly stylised and therefore the collection of shapes together falls under copyright. Insufficient reasoning provided by the nominator. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 20:39, 10 May 2022 (UTC)reply
• Took me a while and I still only really see the P and the F. Keep as fair use. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 09:08, 12 May 2022 (UTC)reply

    ◣ ◢
   ◣█ █◢
  ◣██ ██◢
 ◣███ ███◢
◣████ ████◢
█████ █████
█◤█◤█ ████◥
█ █ █ ████
█ █ █ ████◢
█ █◣█ █████
█ ███ ████◥
◤ ███ ████
  ███ ███◥
  ◤██ ██◥
   ◤█ █◥
    ◤ ◥

• Relicense to {{PD-simple}} and move to Commons. Insufficient for copyright per above. 2001:448A:708C:162E:B49C:B225:3524:987A (talk) 14:50, 11 May 2022 (UTC)reply
  • Note to discussion closer: Please take note that nominator and the comment made above is from the same range.345 — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 15:03, 11 May 2022 (UTC)reply
• Note Fyi, related discussion started by same IP range at Carlobunnie (the file uploader) talkpage and my talkpage trying to argue that file should be licensed as public domain. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 15:03, 11 May 2022 (UTC)reply
• Keep as is, even though I understand the reason the nominator thinks it is a simple-shaped figure (i.e. it is based on File:BTS logo.svg), the additional elements, shades and decolorations raise its level of originality. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 20:01, 11 May 2022 (UTC)reply
  • Still insufficient for copyright per Unicode art above. 2001:448A:708C:162E:242D:922F:3C70:EA5D (talk) 00:59, 12 May 2022 (UTC)reply
    • What is that stuff anyway? — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 09:12, 12 May 2022 (UTC)reply
      • That is stylized "PROOF". That is in a monospaced font but the triangles (◣◢◤◥) are not in the same width as other characters on Windows. 2001:448A:708C:162E:242D:922F:3C70:EA5D (talk) 09:18, 12 May 2022 (UTC)reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 06:02, 15 May 2022 (UTC)reply

File:"Der Sundenfall" Oil Painting by Arthur Kampf 42 x 31.5 cm. (16.5 x 12.4 in.).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by AndrewPDavis (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Copyright violation per WP:NFCC#8. The rational says it is to support encyclopaedic discussion of the topic but there is no discussion about the particular art work in the parent article Arthur Kampf. No rational provided for WP:NFCC#1 or WP:NFCC#2. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 20:37, 10 May 2022 (UTC)reply

• Relicense to PD-art-life-70 and copy to Commons. German author who died in 1950 so passes their Life+70 requirement. In public domain for the United States as created before 1927. Salavat (talk) 00:30, 11 May 2022 (UTC)reply
• Keep clearly PD image under multiple reasons. Buffs (talk) 05:17, 11 May 2022 (UTC)reply
• Keep, relicensed to {{PD-art|PD-US}}{{PD-old-auto|deathyear=1900}}. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 10:01, 12 May 2022 (UTC)reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 18 May 2022 (UTC)reply

File:Uma handset on wifi.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Terrien (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Wallpaper is likely copyrighted and may not be de minimis. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 22:08, 10 May 2022 (UTC)reply

• Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 00:31, 11 May 2022 (UTC)reply
• Delete unused and unnecessary. Buffs (talk) 05:19, 11 May 2022 (UTC)reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.