A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | CH | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9
This page in a nutshell: Readers must be able to check that any of the information within Wikipedia articles is not just made up. This means all material must be attributable to reliable, published sources. Additionally, quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be supported by inline citations. |
In the English Wikipedia, verifiability means other people using the encyclopedia can check that the information comes from a reliable source. Its content is determined by previously published information rather than editors' beliefs, opinions, experiences, or previously unpublished ideas or information. Even if you are sure something is true, it must have been previously published in a reliable source before you can add it. If reliable sources disagree with each other, then maintain a neutral point of view and present what the various sources say, giving each side its due weight.
All material in Wikipedia mainspace, including everything in articles, lists, and captions, must be verifiable. All quotations, and any material whose verifiability has been challenged or is likely to be challenged, must include an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the material. Any material that needs an inline citation but does not have one may be removed. Please immediately remove contentious material about living people that is unsourced or poorly sourced.
For how to write citations, see citing sources. Verifiability, no original research, and neutral point of view are Wikipedia's core content policies. They work together to determine content, so editors should understand the key points of all three. Articles must also comply with the copyright policy.
Responsibility for providing citations
All content must be verifiable. The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and it is satisfied by providing an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution.
Using inline citations, provide reliable, published sources for:
- all quotations
- all material whose verifiability has been challenged
- all material that is likely to be challenged
- all contentious matter about living and recently deceased persons.
The cited source must clearly support the material as presented in the article. Cite the source clearly, ideally giving page number(s)—though sometimes a section, chapter, or other division may be appropriate instead; see Wikipedia:Citing sources for details of how to do this.
Any material lacking an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the material may be removed and should not be restored without an inline citation to a reliable source. Whether and how quickly material should be initially removed for not having an inline citation to a reliable source depends on the material and the overall state of the article. In some cases, editors may object if you remove material without giving them time to provide references. Consider adding a citation needed tag as an interim step. When tagging or removing material for lacking an inline citation, please state your concern that it may not be possible to find a published reliable source, and the material therefore may not be verifiable. If you think the material is verifiable, you are encouraged to provide an inline citation yourself before considering whether to remove or tag it.
Do not leave unsourced or poorly sourced material in an article if it might damage the reputation of living people or existing groups, and do not move it to the talk page. You should also be aware of how Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons also applies to groups.
Reliable sources
What counts as a reliable source
A cited source on Wikipedia is often a specific portion of text (such as a short article or a page in a book). But when editors discuss sources (for example, to debate their appropriateness or reliability) the word source has four related meanings:
- The work itself (the article, book: "That book looks like a useful source for this article.") and works like it ("An obituary can be a useful biographical source", "A recent source is better than an old one")
- The creator of the work (the writer, journalist: "What do we know about that source's reputation?") and people like them ("A medical researcher is a better source than a journalist for medical claims").
- The publication (for example, the newspaper, journal, magazine: "That source covers the arts.") and publications like them ("A newspaper is not a reliable source for medical claims").
- The publisher of the work (for example, Cambridge University Press: "That source publishes reference works.") and publishers like them ("An academic publisher is a good source of reference works").
All four can affect reliability.
Base articles on reliable, independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. Source material must have been published, the definition of which for the purposes of Wikipedia is made available to the public in some form. Unpublished materials are not considered reliable. Use sources that directly support the material presented in an article and are appropriate to the claims made. The appropriateness of any source depends on the context. Be especially careful when sourcing content related to living people or medicine.
If available, academic and peer-reviewed publications are usually the most reliable sources on topics such as history, medicine, and science.
Editors may also use material from reliable non-academic sources, particularly if it appears in respected mainstream publications. Other reliable sources include:
- University-level textbooks
- Books published by respected publishing houses
- Mainstream (non-fringe) magazines, including specialty ones
- Reputable newspapers
Editors may also use electronic media, subject to the same criteria (see details in Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources and Wikipedia:Search engine test).
Best sources
The best sources have a professional structure for checking or analyzing facts, legal issues, evidence, and arguments. The greater the degree of scrutiny given to these issues, the more reliable the source.
Newspaper and magazine blogs
Some newspapers, magazines, and other news organizations host online columns they call blogs. These may be acceptable sources if the writers are professionals, but use them with caution because blogs may not be subject to the news organization's normal fact-checking process. If a news organization publishes an opinion piece in a blog, attribute the statement to the writer, e.g. "Jane Smith wrote ..." Never use the blog comments that are left by the readers as sources. For personal or group blogs that are not reliable sources, see § Self-published sources below.
Reliable sources noticeboard and guideline
To discuss the reliability of a specific source for a particular statement, consult Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard, which seeks to apply this policy to particular cases. For a guideline discussing the reliability of particular types of sources, see Wikipedia:Reliable sources. In the case of inconsistency between this policy and the Wikipedia:Reliable sources guideline, or any other guideline related to sourcing, this policy has priority.
Sources that are usually not reliable
Questionable sources
Questionable sources are those that have a poor reputation for checking the facts, lack meaningful editorial oversight, or have an apparent conflict of interest.
Such sources include websites and publications expressing views widely considered by other sources to be promotional, extremist, or relying heavily on unsubstantiated gossip, rumor, or personal opinion. Questionable sources should be used only as sources for material on themselves, such as in articles about themselves; see below. They are not suitable sources for contentious claims about others.
Predatory open access journals are considered questionable due to the absence of quality control in the peer-review process.
Self-published sources
Anyone can create a personal web page, self-publish a book, or claim to be an expert. That is why self-published material such as books, patents, newsletters, personal websites, open wikis, personal or group blogs (as distinguished from newsblogs, above), content farms, Internet forum postings, and social media postings are largely not acceptable as sources. Self-published expert sources may be considered reliable when produced by an established subject-matter expert, whose work in the relevant field has previously been published by reliable, independent publications. Exercise caution when using such sources: if the information in question is suitable for inclusion, someone else will probably have published it in independent, reliable sources. Never use self-published sources as third-party sources about living people, even if the author is an expert, well-known professional researcher, or writer.
Self-published or questionable sources as sources on themselves
It has been suggested that Wikipedia:Reliable sources#Self-published and questionable sources as sources on themselves and Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons#Using the subject as a self-published source be merged into this section. (Discuss) Proposed since December 2023. |
Self-published and questionable sources may be used as sources of information about themselves, usually in articles about themselves or their activities, without the self-published source requirement that they are established experts in the field, so long as:
- The material is neither unduly self-serving nor an exceptional claim;
- It does not involve claims about third parties;
- It does not involve claims about events not directly related to the source;
- There is no reasonable doubt as to its authenticity; and
- The article is not based primarily on such sources.
This policy also applies to material made public by the source on social networking websites such as Twitter, Tumblr, LinkedIn, Reddit, and Facebook.
Wikipedia and sources that mirror or use it
Do not use articles from Wikipedia (whether English Wikipedia or Wikipedias in other languages) as sources, since Wikipedia is a user-generated source. Also, do not use websites mirroring Wikipedia content or publications relying on material from Wikipedia as sources. Content from a Wikipedia article is not considered reliable unless it is backed up by citing reliable sources. Confirm that these sources support the content, then use them directly.
An exception is allowed when Wikipedia itself is being discussed in the article. These may cite an article, guideline, discussion, statistic, or other content from Wikipedia (or a sister project) to support a statement about Wikipedia. Wikipedia or the sister project is a primary source in this case and may be used following the policy for primary sources. Any such use should avoid original research, undue emphasis on Wikipedia's role or views, and inappropriate self-reference. The article text should clarify how the material is sourced from Wikipedia to inform the reader about the potential bias.
Accessibility
Access to sources
Do not reject reliable sources just because they are difficult or costly to access. Some reliable sources are not easily accessible. For example, an online source may require payment, and a print-only source may be available only through libraries. Rare historical sources may even be available only in special museum collections and archives. If you have trouble accessing a source, others may be able to do so on your behalf (see WikiProject Resource Exchange).
Non-English sources
Citing
Citations to non-English reliable sources are allowed on the English Wikipedia. However, because this project is in English, English-language sources are preferred over non-English ones when they are available and of equal quality and relevance. As with sources in English, if a dispute arises involving a citation to a non-English source, editors may request a quotation of relevant portions of the original source be provided, either in text, in a footnote, or on the article talk page. (See Template:Request quotation.)
Quoting
If you quote a non-English reliable source (whether in the main text or in a footnote), a translation into English should accompany the quote. Translations published by reliable sources are preferred over translations by Wikipedians, but translations by Wikipedians are preferred over machine translations. When using a machine translation of source material, editors should be reasonably certain that the translation is accurate and the source is appropriate. Editors should not rely upon machine translations of non-English sources in contentious articles or biographies of living people. If needed, ask an editor who can translate it for you.
The original text is usually included with the translated text in articles when translated by Wikipedians, and the translating editor is usually not cited. When quoting any material, whether in English or in some other language, be careful not to violate copyright; see the fair-use guideline.
Other issues
Verifiability does not guarantee inclusion
While information must be verifiable for inclusion in an article, not all verifiable information must be included. Consensus may determine that certain information does not improve an article. Such information should be omitted or presented instead in a different article. The responsibility for achieving consensus for inclusion is on those seeking to include disputed content.
Tagging a sentence, section, or article
If you want to request an inline citation for an unsourced statement, you can tag a sentence with the {{citation needed}} template by writing {{cn}} or {{fact}}. Other templates exist for tagging sections or entire articles here. You can also leave a note on the talk page asking for a source, or move the material to the talk page and ask for a source there. To request verification that a reference supports the text, tag it with {{verification needed}}. Material that fails verification may be tagged with {{failed verification}} or removed. It helps other editors to explain your rationale for using templates to tag material in the template, edit summary, or on the talk page.
Take special care with contentious material about living and recently deceased people. Unsourced or poorly sourced material that is contentious, especially text that is negative, derogatory, or potentially damaging, should be removed immediately rather than tagged or moved to the talk page.
Exceptional claims require exceptional sources
Any exceptional claim requires multiple high-quality sources. Warnings (red flags) that should prompt extra caution include:
- Surprising or apparently important claims not covered by multiple mainstream sources;
- Challenged claims that are supported purely by primary or self-published sources or those with an apparent conflict of interest;
- Reports of a statement by someone that seems out of character or against an interest they had previously defended;
- Claims contradicted by the prevailing view within the relevant community or that would significantly alter mainstream assumptions—especially in science, medicine, history, politics, and biographies of living and recently dead people. This is especially true when proponents say there is a conspiracy to silence them.
Verifiability and other principles
Copyright and plagiarism
Do not plagiarize or breach copyright when using sources. Summarize source material in your own words as much as possible; when quoting or closely paraphrasing a source, use an inline citation, and in-text attribution where appropriate.
Do not link to any source that violates the copyrights of others per contributors' rights and obligations. You can link to websites that display copyrighted works as long as the website has licensed the work or uses the work in a way compliant with fair use. Knowingly directing others to material that violates copyright may be considered contributory copyright infringement. If there is reason to think a source violates copyright, do not cite it. This is particularly relevant when linking to sites such as Scribd or YouTube, where due care should be taken to avoid linking to material violating copyright.
Neutrality
Even when information is cited to reliable sources, you must present it with a neutral point of view (NPOV). Articles should be based on thorough research of sources. All articles must adhere to NPOV, fairly representing all majority and significant-minority viewpoints published by reliable sources, in rough proportion to the prominence of each view. Tiny-minority views need not be included, except in articles devoted to them. If there is a disagreement between sources, use in-text attribution: "John Smith argues X, while Paul Jones maintains Y," followed by an inline citation. Sources themselves do not need to maintain a neutral point of view. Indeed, many reliable sources are not neutral. Our job as editors is simply to summarize what reliable sources say.
Notability
If no reliable, independent sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it (i.e., the topic is not notable). However, notability is based on the existence of suitable sources, not on the state of sourcing in an article (WP:NEXIST).
Original research
The no original research policy (NOR) is closely related to the Verifiability policy. Among its requirements are:
- All material in Wikipedia articles must be attributable to a reliable published source. This means a reliable published source must exist for it, whether or not it is cited in the article.
- Sources must support the material clearly and directly: drawing inferences from multiple sources to advance a novel position is prohibited by the NOR policy.
- Base articles largely on reliable secondary sources. While primary sources are appropriate in some cases, relying on them can be problematic. For more information, see the Primary, secondary, and tertiary sources section of the NOR policy, and the Misuse of primary sources section of the BLP policy.
See also
Guidelines
Information pages
Resources
- Backlog – links to articles that need citations added
- Template index/Sources of articles – maintenance templates for articles with sourcing problems
- The Wikipedia Library – free access to newspapers, journals, and magazines for experienced editors
- WikiProject Resource Exchange – where you can ask for help with checking an individual source
Essays
Notes
- ^ This principle was previously expressed on this policy page as "the threshold for inclusion is verifiability, not truth". See the essay, Wikipedia:Verifiability, not truth.
- ^ a b c A source "directly supports" a given piece of material if the information is present explicitly in the source, so that using this source to support the material is not a violation of Wikipedia:No original research. The location of any citation—including whether one is present in the article at all—is unrelated to whether a source directly supports the material. For questions about where and how to place citations, see Wikipedia:Citing sources, Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section § Citations, etc.
- ^ Once an editor has provided any source they believe, in good faith, to be sufficient, then any editor who later removes the material must articulate specific problems that would justify its exclusion from Wikipedia (e.g. why the source is unreliable; the source does not support the claim; undue emphasis; unencyclopedic content; etc.). If necessary, all editors are then expected to help achieve consensus, and any problems with the text or sourcing should be fixed before the material is added back.
- ^ It may be that the article contains so few citations it is impractical to add specific citation needed tags. Consider then tagging a section with {{unreferenced section}}, or the article with the applicable of either {{unreferenced}} or {{more citations needed}}. For a disputed category, you may use {{unreferenced category}}. For a disambiguation page, consider asking for a citation on the talk page.
- ^ When tagging or removing such material, please keep in mind such edits can easily be misunderstood. Some editors object to others making chronic, frequent, and large-scale deletions of unsourced information, especially if unaccompanied by other efforts to improve the material. Do not concentrate only on material of a particular point of view, as that may appear to be a contravention of Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. Also, check to see whether the material is sourced to a citation elsewhere on the page. For all these reasons, it is advisable to clearly communicate that you have a considered reason to believe the material in question cannot be verified.
- ^ This includes material such as documents in publicly accessible archives as well as inscriptions in plain sight, e.g. tombstones.
- ^ a b Note that any exceptional claim would require exceptional sources.
- ^ a b When there is a dispute as to whether a piece of text is fully supported by a given source, direct quotes and other relevant details from the source should be provided to other editors as a courtesy. Do not violate the source's copyright when doing so.
References
- ^ Wales, Jimmy. "Zero information is preferred to misleading or false information", WikiEN-l, May 16, 2006: "I can NOT emphasize this enough. There seems to be a terrible bias among some editors that some sort of random speculative 'I heard it somewhere' pseudo information is to be tagged with a 'needs a cite' tag. Wrong. It should be removed, aggressively, unless it can be sourced. This is true of all information, but it is particularly true of negative information about living persons."
- ^ Self-published material is characterized by the lack of independent reviewers (those without a conflict of interest) validating the reliability of the content. Further examples of self-published sources include press releases, the material contained within company websites, advertising campaigns, material published in media by the owner(s)/publisher(s) of the media group, self-released music albums, and electoral manifestos:
- The University of California, Berkeley, library states: "Most pages found in general search engines for the web are self-published or published by businesses small and large with motives to get you to buy something or believe a point of view. Even within university and library web sites, there can be many pages that the institution does not try to oversee."
- Princeton University offers this understanding in its publication, Academic Integrity at Princeton (2011): "Unlike most books and journal articles, which undergo strict editorial review before publication, much of the information on the Web is self-published. To be sure, there are many websites in which you can have confidence: mainstream newspapers, refereed electronic journals, and university, library, and government collections of data. But for vast amounts of Web-based information, no impartial reviewers have evaluated the accuracy or fairness of such material before it's made instantly available across the globe."
- The Chicago Manual of Style, 16th Edition states, "Any site that does not have a specific publisher or sponsoring body should be treated as unpublished or self-published work."
- ^ Rekdal, Ole Bjørn (1 August 2014). "Academic urban legends". Social Studies of Science. 44 (4): 638–654. doi:10.1177/0306312714535679. ISSN 0306-3127. PMC 4232290. PMID 25272616.
- ^ Hume, David. An Enquiry concerning Human Understanding, Forgotten Books, 1984, pp. 82, 86; first published in 1748 as Philosophical enquiries concerning human Understanding, (or the Oxford 1894 edition OL 7067396M at para. 91) "A wise man ... proportions his belief to the evidence ... That no testimony is sufficient to establish a miracle, unless the testimony is of such a kind, that its falsehood would be more miraculous, than the fact, which it endeavors to establish; and even in that case there is a mutual destruction of arguments, and the superior only gives us an assurance suitable to that degree of force, which remains, after deducting the inferior." In the 18th century, Pierre-Simon Laplace reformulated the idea as "The weight of evidence for an extraordinary claim must be proportioned to its strangeness." Marcello Truzzi recast it again, in 1978, as "An extraordinary claim requires extraordinary proof." Carl Sagan, finally, popularized the concept broadly as "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence" in 1980 on Cosmos: A Personal Voyage; this was the formulation originally used on Wikipedia.
Further reading
- Wales, Jimmy. "Insist on sources", WikiEN-l, July 19, 2006: "I really want to encourage a much stronger culture which says: it is better to have no information, than to have information like this, with no sources."—referring to a rather unlikely statement about the founders of Google throwing pies at each other.
Text je dostupný za podmienok Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License 3.0 Unported; prípadne za ďalších podmienok. Podrobnejšie informácie nájdete na stránke Podmienky použitia.
Číňané
Časová osa ruské invaze na Ukrajinu (2022)
Černá Hora
Česká terminologická databáze knihovnictví a informační vědy
Česká verze Wikipedie
Česká Wikipedie
České vysoké učení technické v Praze
Československá armáda
Československá národní rada
Československo
Ču Jou-sung
Říše Čching
Říše Ming
Řím
Šablona:Citation
Šablona:Cite web
1. duben
1. květen
1. září
10. duben
10. prosinec
11. duben
12. duben
12. květen
13. červen
13. duben
14. duben
14. srpen
1488
15. červen
15. duben
15. květen
15. září
1523
1555
1584
1585
16. duben
16. leden
1619
1651
1652
1661
1671
1673
1674
1677
17. březen
17. duben
1706
1711
1717
1719
1729
1730
1735
1742
1752
1757
1763
1767
1774
1776
1782
1783
1784
1785
1790
1796
18. únor
18. duben
18. leden
1805
1811
1814
1816
1818
1822
1828
1829
1837
1838
1849
1852
1855
1862
1864
1868
1870
1871
1876
1878
1880
1882
1885
1886
1891
1892
1893
1895
19. duben
19. listopad
1900
1904
1906
1907
1910
1912
1913
1917
1918
1919
1920
1921
1922
1924
1926
1929
1930
1933
1935
1936
1940
1942
1945
1946
1947
1949
1950
1952
1953
1958
1960
1965
1973
1976
1977
1985
1987
1989
1990
1992
1995
2. červen
2. duben
2. květen
20. duben
2000
2001
2002
2003
2005
2008
2010
2012
2015
2017
2019
2020
2023
21. červen
21. červenec
21. březen
22. duben
23. duben
24. březen
24. duben
24. listopad
24. prosinec
25. duben
25. prosinec
26. duben
27. duben
28. duben
29. únor
29. březen
29. duben
29. srpen
3. únor
3. duben
30. duben
31. červenec
31. březen
31. prosinec
4. říjen
4. duben
4. květen
43 př. n. l.
5. říjen
5. březen
5. duben
5. květen
6. duben
7. duben
753 př. n. l.
8. duben
8. listopad
9. říjen
9. duben
9. září
Aš
ActiveX
Alžběta II.
Alžběta Vilemína Württemberská
Alexandra
Alt attribute
Amálie Vilemína Brunšvicko-Lüneburská
Andie MacDowell
Anthony Quinn
Antonín Kammel
Antonín Novák (houslista)
API
Apple
Apple II
Armáda Spojených států amerických
Article element
Autoritní kontrola
Azovstal
Bedřich Beneš Buchlovan
Benutzer:Kurt Jansson/Vortrag auf dem 19C3
Benutzer:Kurt Jansson/Vortrag auf dem 19C3
BiggestWiki
Bitva o Madagaskar
Bitva o Mariupol
Bitva u Liberce
Bitva u Mutiny
Bitva u Puebly
Blink element
Bořivoj Lůžek
Bob Hurikán
Bologna
Bracket#Angle brackets
Brasília
Brazílie
Britská armáda
Browser engine
Browser Object Model
Bzenecká lípa
Cache (computing)
CamelCase
Canvas element
Cascading Style Sheets
Character encodings in HTML
Charles-Joseph de Flahaut
Charles Darwin
Charlotte Brontëová
Chu Čeng-jen
Commons:Featured pictures/cs
Comparison of browser engines
Comparison of document markup languages
Comparison of stylesheet languages
CSS
CSS#Sources
CSS animations
CSS box model
CSS Flexible Box Layout
CSS grid layout
CSS image replacement
CSS Zen Garden
Diff
Digital container format
Div and span
Document file format
Document Object Model
Document Style Semantics and Specification Language
DokuWiki
Doněcké akademické oblastní činoherní divadlo
Druhá světová válka
Duben
Dynamic HTML
Dynastie Jižní Ming
Edita Štaubertová
Ekonomické důsledky ruské invaze na Ukrajinu (2022)
Emilia Galotti
Emmanuel Macron
Encyclopædia Britannica
Encyklopedie
Encyklopedie Navajo
Evoluce
Fantasy
Fault-tolerant system
Ferdinand Peroutka
Fieldset
File:HTML5 logo and wordmark.svg
File:Question book-new.svg
File:Wikibooks-logo.svg
Filename extension
Filmová promítačka
First-person shooter
Font family (HTML)
Formatting Output Specification Instance
Frame (World Wide Web)
François Athanase de Charette de la Contrie
Francie
Francouzská armáda
Francouzská intervence v Mexiku
Francouzská národní knihovna
František Ferdinand Šamberk
František Suchý Pražský
Fredrik Bajer
Friedrich Fröbel
Gemeinsame Normdatei
Georg Joseph Kamel
Glen Hansard
Gotthold Ephraim Lessing
Gregoriánský kalendář
Guy Lafleur
Hannibal Goodwin
Havajština
Help:HTML in wikitext
Help:Maintenance template removal
Help:Referencing for beginners
Hippolyte Taine
Hlavní strana
Hnutí Svoboda (Slovinsko)
Holy grail (web design)
Honolulu
Hospodářský růst
HTML
HTML5
HTML5 audio
HTML5 video
HTML attribute
HTML editor
HTML element
HTML element#Images and objects
HTML elements
HTM (disambiguation)
Humphry Repton
Hyperlink
Hypertext
HyperText Markup Language
Iggy Pop
Ignacio Zaragoza
Ignatius Krahl
Ingenuity
International Standard Book Number
Internetová diskuse
Internetový bot
Internet Explorer
IP adresa
Isaac Asimov
Itálie
Ivan Petrovič Kulibin
Janez Janša
Jan Štrobl
Jan Kostrhun
Jan Pavel II.
Jan van Riebeeck
Jarmila Stojčevská
Jaroslav Hýbl
Jaroslav Hutka
Jaroslav Kvapil (skladatel)
JavaScript
JavaScript Style Sheets
Jean-Baptiste Biot
Jiří Čepelák
Jiří Hrubeš
Jiřina Šedinová
Johann Christian Ferdinand Höfer
John Law
Josef I. Habsburský
Joseph Vaz
Jozef Herda
Judita Čeřovská
Kaligrafie
Kapské Město
Karel Balling (chemik)
Karel Pippich
Karlštejn
Kategorie:Čas
Kategorie:Články podle témat
Kategorie:Život
Kategorie:Dorozumívání
Kategorie:Geografie
Kategorie:Historie
Kategorie:Hlavní kategorie
Kategorie:Informace
Kategorie:Kultura
Kategorie:Lidé
Kategorie:Matematika
Kategorie:Příroda
Kategorie:Politika
Kategorie:Právo
Kategorie:Rekordy
Kategorie:Seznamy
Kategorie:Společnost
Kategorie:Sport
Kategorie:Technika
Kategorie:Umění
Kategorie:Věda
Kategorie:Vojenství
Kategorie:Vzdělávání
Kategorie:Zdravotnictví
Klaus Schulze
Kuo-c’-ťien
Květen
Ladislav Koubek
Ladislav Pavelka
Language code
Lee de Forest
Leopold Antonín Podstatský
Less (stylesheet language)
Less (style sheet language)
Library of Congress Control Number
Lidé a země
Listopad
List of style sheet languages
List of XML and HTML character entity references
Lodovico Carracci
Louis-Auguste Bisson
Lynx (browser)
Madagaskar
Maia Sanduová
Manuel Estiarte
Marcus Antonius
Maria Anna Sala
Mariupol
Markup (computer programming)
Markup language
Marquee element
Meda Mládková
MediaWiki
Media type
Metapedie
Meta element
Mezinárodní měnový fond
Michel Rolle
Miloš Zeman
Mittelbau-Dora
Moldavsko
Mozilla Firefox
Mwai Kibaki
Nápověda:Úvod
Nápověda:Úvod pro nováčky
Národní knihovna České republiky
Národní knihovna Izraele
Návrhový vzor
Nadace Wikimedia
Nanking
Necyklopedie
Nikola Buranská
Norbert Frýd
Nosticovo divadlo
Nupedia
Odbory
Olbram Zoubek
Open file format
Opera (web browser)
Osecký klášter
Otevřený software
Oxford English Dictionary
Pandemie covidu-19
Pandemie covidu-19 v Česku
Partyzán
Paul Karrer
Pavel Zářecký
Pavol Mešťan
Pečeť
Perseverance
Petr Nečas
Petr Pokorný (teolog)
Petr Rak
Plnotext
Plugin
Podněstří
Polsko
Portál:Aktuality
Portál:Doprava
Portál:Geografie
Portál:Historie
Portál:Kultura
Portál:Lidé
Portál:Náboženství
Portál:Obsah
Portál:Příroda
Portál:Sport
PostCSS
Praha
Pravda (noviny)
Prezident
Programovací jazyk
Q171#identifiers
Q171#identifiers|Editovat na Wikidatech
Qt (software)
Quirks mode
Radim Uzel
Refreshable Braille display
Responsive web design
Rio de Janeiro
Robert Fico
Robert Golob
Robert Kaliňák
Robert Saudek
Robert Smith (hudebník)
Ruská invaze na Ukrajinu (2022)
Rusko
Sýrie
Safari (web browser)
Sass (stylesheet language)
Sass (style sheet language)
Scripting language
Sedmiletá válka
Semantics
Semantic Web
Separation of concerns
Separation of content and presentation
Seznam českých wiki encyklopedií
Slávka Budínová
Slovenska demokratska stranka
Slovensko
Slovinsko
SMIL Timesheets
Sociální software
Software
Software release life cycle
Soubor:Andie MacDowell Cannes.jpg
Soubor:Anthony Quinn signed.JPG
Soubor:Apple-II.jpg
Soubor:Flag of Mars.svg
Soubor:GlenHansard.jpg
Soubor:HNL Wiki Wiki Bus.jpg
Soubor:Hutka.simecek.jpg
Soubor:IggyChesterRocks.jpg
Soubor:Manel Estiarte (Diada de Sant Jordi 2009).jpg
Soubor:Olbram-Zoubek.jpg
Soubor:Paul Karrer.jpg
Soubor:Persimmon and Three Yellow Tangerines.jpg
Soubor:Queen Elizabeth II March 2015.jpg
Soubor:Robert Smith of The Cure live in Singapore 1 August 2007.jpg
Speciální:Kategorie
Speciální:Nové stránky
Speciální:Statistika
Speciální:Zdroje knih/0-201-71499-X
Speciální:Zdroje knih/2-9520514-4-5
Speciální:Zdroje knih/9781448855575
Spojené státy americké
Standard Generalized Markup Language
Strojový překlad
Structured document
Stuttgart
Style sheet (desktop publishing)
Style sheet (web development)
Style sheet language
Stylish
Stylus (browser extension)
Stylus (stylesheet language)
Stylus (style sheet language)
Světová ekonomika
Třída T 47
Tableless web design
Template:CSS
Template:HTML
Template:Stylesheet languages
Template talk:CSS
Template talk:HTML
Template talk:Stylesheet languages
Teroristické útoky na Srí Lance 21. dubna 2019
Theodor Kašpárek
Tiskař
Turecko
TWiki
Type code
Ukrajina
Ulrich von Hutten
Unicode and HTML
Uniform Type Identifier
UseModWiki
User agent
User interface style sheet language
Václav Cigler
Vídeň
Věra Nerušilová
V-2
Vannevar Bush
Vichistická Francie
Viktor Janiš
Viktor Zvjahincev
Vláda Černé Hory
Vladimír Hulpach
Vlasta Prachatická
Vojtěch Říhovský
Volby prezidenta Francie 2022
Vzdušný prostor
W3C Markup Validation Service
Ward Cunningham
Web3D
WebCL
WebGL
WebGPU
Webový prohlížeč
Webpage
WebXR
Web browser
Web colors
Web content
Web design
Web page
Web server
Web storage
WHATWG
Wiki
Wikicitáty:Hlavní strana
Wikidata:Hlavní strana
Wikiknihy:Hlavní strana
Wikimedia Česká republika
Wikimedia Commons
Wikipedia:Verifiability
Wikipedie
Wikipedie:Údržba
Wikipedie:Časté chyby
Wikipedie:Často kladené otázky
Wikipedie:Článek týdne
Wikipedie:Článek týdne/2022
Wikipedie:Citování Wikipedie
Wikipedie:Dobré články
Wikipedie:Dobré články#Portály
Wikipedie:Kontakt
Wikipedie:Nejlepší články
Wikipedie:Obrázek týdne
Wikipedie:Obrázek týdne/2022
Wikipedie:Požadované články
Wikipedie:Pod lípou
Wikipedie:Portál Wikipedie
Wikipedie:Potřebuji pomoc
Wikipedie:Průvodce
Wikipedie:Seznam jazyků Wikipedie
Wikipedie:Velvyslanectví
Wikipedie:Vybraná výročí dne/květen
Wikipedie:WikiProjekt Kvalita/Články k rozšíření
Wikipedie:Zajímavosti
Wikipedie:Zajímavosti/2022
Wikipedie:Zdroje informací
WikiSkripta
Wikislovník:Hlavní strana
Wikiverzita:Hlavní strana
Wikizdroje:Hlavní strana
Wikizprávy:Hlavní strana
Wiki (rozcestník)
Wiki Wiki Shuttle
Wolfenstein 3D
World Wide Web
World Wide Web Consortium
WYSIWYG
XHTML
XHTML Basic
XHTML Mobile Profile
XSL
XSLT
Zdeněk Fiala
Značkovací jazyk
Zvukový film
Text je dostupný za podmienok Creative
Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License 3.0 Unported; prípadne za ďalších
podmienok.
Podrobnejšie informácie nájdete na stránke Podmienky
použitia.
www.astronomia.sk | www.biologia.sk | www.botanika.sk | www.dejiny.sk | www.economy.sk | www.elektrotechnika.sk | www.estetika.sk | www.farmakologia.sk | www.filozofia.sk | Fyzika | www.futurologia.sk | www.genetika.sk | www.chemia.sk | www.lingvistika.sk | www.politologia.sk | www.psychologia.sk | www.sexuologia.sk | www.sociologia.sk | www.veda.sk I www.zoologia.sk